VideoVista logo
MONTHLY WEB-ZINE OF  
DVD & BLU-RAY REVIEWS
 
action | adventure | art | cartoon | comedy | cult | disaster | docu | drama | fantasy | horror | kung fu | monster | musical | parody | romance | satire | sequel | SF | sport | spy | surreal | 3D | thriller | TV | war | western
VideoVista covers rental and retail titles in all genres and movie or TV categories, with filmmaker interviews, auteur profiles, top 10 lists, plus regular prize draws.

HOME PAGE
INDEX OF ALL REVIEWS
SEARCH THIS SITE
COMPETITIONS
FORTHCOMING REVIEWS
TOP 10 LISTS
INTERVIEWS & PROFILES
RETRO REVIEWS SECTION
ABOUT OUR CONTRIBUTORS
READERS' COMMENTS
SUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER
SITE MAP
LINKS


SUPPORT THIS SITE -
SHOP USING THESE LINKS

In Association with Amazon.com


visit other Pigasus Press sites...
The ZONE - genre nonfiction
Soundchecks - music reviews
Rotary Action - helicopter movies

September 2011

The Frankenstein Experiment

cast: Tiffany Shepis, Patti Tindall, Scott Anthony Leet, and Ed Lauter

director: Sean Tretta

87 minutes (18) 2010
widescreen ratio 16:9
4 Digital Media DVD Region 2

RATING: 2/10
review by Matthew S. Dent

The Frankenstein Experiment

There is a long and, in film, fairly respected tradition of misconception around certain scientific phenomenon. Radiation makes things grow really big. Spaceships can zip across the galaxy in hours. Black holes are gateways to alternate dimensions. The newest addition seems to be that stem cells, which can do pretty much whatever the story demands.

Enter The Frankenstein Experiment (aka: The Frankenstein Syndrome), the thrust of whose plot can largely be guessed from the title. A group of researchers at a secretive, privately funded institute are conducting illegal stem cell research on people. They create a serum, which through the magic of stem cells brings back the dead: all nice and cuddly until the resurrected people start to get violent.

There are definitely similarities with the Frankenstein story, but the original's trademark intelligence and philosophical points get lost or left behind by a confused and disjointed plot. In the end, a confusing religious twist leaves a viewer scratching his head, and not in a particularly good way.

The main problem is the characters. Whoever wrote them didn't seem to really know who these people were, and as a result they end up serving the plot rather than feeling at all like real people. Characters should, I believe, have defined personalities in the same way that real people do. Having characters wildly change their very nature midway through is not good writing.

Take, for example, the main character, who narrates the whole story starts off willing to break the rules to advance medical science. But then the next moment, she's adamantly against everything they're doing. Similarly, the 'head scientist' is a cold, heartless witch, until they manage to resurrect someone. This could be seen as character development, but for the fact that it happens suddenly, without any traceable 'development'. Rather, the writer simply decided that the characters needed to be different at that point in the story.

Looking beyond its flaws, though, the foundation upon which the story is built is an interesting and well thought through idea. Indeed, it could have been a good film, if it had been more competently executed. The finished product does not cover the writer and director in glory, and the jarring final scene, out of step with the rest of the film, sums up the whole affair, really.



Premonitions in paperback - click to order

VideoVista copyright © 2001 - is published by PIGASUS Press